Happy birthday Tottenham Hotspur: Thrilling match ends with four goals each
Written by Damian   
Monday, 01 October 2007

I don't know what has surprised me the most tonight. It could be that Martin Laursen scored twice, but I don't think so. It could also be that as soon as we bring on Marlon Harewood we play nothing but long ball, but I don't think it's that either.

You know what I think it is; it's that eleven so called professionals could be three goals clear with just over twenty minutes to go and they go and mess it all up.

Okay, we got a point but a point I'm afraid isn't good enough. Yes, it's what I predicted but with 23 minutes to go we were 4-1 up.

Martin O'Neill talks about consistency a lot and if anything we are consistent. I was watching on TV and I said to the wife at 4-1 that Spurs would equalise because if anything we were lucky to be 4-1 up.

Laursen got two fortunate goals and at best we deserved two but we were very lucky. I think when we were 4-1 we'd had seven shots and all of them were on target. Spurs had had eleven and seven on target and only scored one.

It could also be because we have a better keeper but that's another debate and not for now. Did we deserve to draw tonight, yes but we shouldn't have.

I'm sure there will be analysis of this somewhere but I'm not going to point fingers but somebody has to take responsibility.

Also, please don't forget that for £10 you can enter the raffle to play at Villa Park.

I know some of you are thinking that if Marlon Harewood can play you shouldn't have to buy a raffle ticket, but it is for a good cause and only £10. Go on, there are just over 70 left.

Comments (41)add comment

brett said:

hope steve mcclaren was watching the keepers, carson might have conceeded 4 but i thought he was excellent again tonight, not likely though is it
October 01, 2007

jaf said:

Well i'm not happy... 4-1 up 20 mins to go, come on we are supposed to be a good team (and squad). Maybe we were lucky to be 4-1 up doesnt mean we have to through it away...!! I have to say luck and them having a dodgy keeper are not the same thing.!
October 01, 2007

Crusty Stain said:

Marlon Harewood is not a very good footballer.
October 01, 2007

alwaysvilla said:

i am gutted feels like a defeat to me!!!!
October 01, 2007

Jonas_Swe said:

I hope MON suspends Harewood for a lifetime or two. His "tackle" in the corner of the penalty area is beyond all stupidity. He is definitely the one to blame. With two goals up it is easier to defend.
October 01, 2007

meregolfclub said:

we are still a team that is work in progress.
we have a couple of positions that we lack quality in.
MON now knows that this team finds it very difficult to
keep a lead till the end. Even my misses said it would be a draw when it was 4-1. and what does she know about football.
Nigel reo said it in a article - the team lacks in self belief.
What we really need in January is a team leader -someone who can bully the quieter ones into doing what they should be doing. keeping a lead.
There is agood team in there.
Martin, learn about them and change them into winners
we know you can do it.
October 01, 2007

wagonwheel said:

Have to agree Damo, we were so lucky to get anything tonight. We have no consistency and rode our luck tonight - it won't be often we say we were lucky to darw after scoring 4 but we never convinced. NRC shot himself in the foot with an early booking and never figured thereafter, Gardener looked nervous,and bouma and Mellberg just hoofed possession away at every chance. The game was away from us long before Harewood arrived, and we just couldnt control the game even at 4-5-1. We still need a bigger squad (RM, CM, RB and CF) more options. Much more work needed, our league position flatters us.
October 01, 2007

martin3316 said:

why did O'Neill change the format he helped throw it away
and Harwood what a donkey could have gone 5th not like that
we won't
October 01, 2007

neil (tottenham fan) said:

crusty is right about marlon. Villa played wel and deserved to be 4-1 up i think. I'm not sure I believe you can be lucky 4 times? It is true that Tottenham are the unluckiest team in the prem. Thankyou Aston Villa for making it an entertaining game. (I would rather we won tho)
October 01, 2007 | url

chris av said:

At the beggining of the season would def taken the draw at white heart lane, so in that respect i am pleased. However i think o neil ( who i like ) made mistakes with his substitutions why change the forwards when we are 4-1 up ? and why take gardner off who is a combative midfielder and stick petrov on who cant tackle.Harewood at best can be described not good that pen was sunday league, he looks a big waste of 4 mil but time will tell.I won £ 50.00 off my spurs friends because i got the draw but i also feel as if we lost tonight.
October 01, 2007

Dizzy Mugs said:

I don't think we deserved to lose.
You say were didn't deserve to score with Laursen's but a goal is a goal isn't it.
We don't have to create quality goals just to 'deserve to win'. Spurs deserve that point, one hell of a comeback. Carson was great even if he conceded 4. His ariel presence was much better than usual. Defoe showed how much he deserved to start and Harewood and Zat Knight showed how much they deserve to be dropped. Nigel Reo-Coker was very average and we simply pulled back too much. If we didn't bring Harewood on and kept the formations the same i think it would be 4-2 at maximum.
October 01, 2007

Falsify said:

Conceding 3 goals in 20 mins is absolutely disgraceful. Especially on the back of the Leicester debacle. This teams is supposed to be young and British so where is the British never say die attitude? Where is the grit and determination? Blood and honour!! Seems like we got a squad full of fairies. I didnt believe that after the Chelsea game but now i'm wondering whether that was just a flukey one off.

Come on Martin bollock the lads and prove me wrong!!!
October 01, 2007 | url

Dizzy Mugs said:

Just realised how many times i said deserved in a few sentences smilies/cool.gif
October 01, 2007

Damian said:

Dizzy

i'm not saying we didn't deserve the goals i'm just saying we were lucky to be 4-1 up ... when you consider number of chances

we were very very unlucky to lose that lead
October 01, 2007 | url

linden1983 said:

F*****G GARBAGE

EVEN AT 4-1 UP I KNEW WE WOULD BALLS IT UP, AND I WASNT WRONG.

SHOCKING SUBSTITUTIONS BY O'NEILL. AWFUL. HAREWOOD IS ARGUABLY THE WORST PLAYER IVE SEEN PUT ON A CLARET SHIRT AND PETROV NOT FAR BEHIND.

YOU HAD TO EXPECT A BIT OF A SPURS FIGHTBACK, BUT TO PLAY THE GAME INTO THEIR HANDS BY SITTING BACK AND JUST HOOFING THE BALL FORWARD FOR OVER 30 MINUTES, IT BACKFIRED BIG TIME.

TOO MANY PLAYERS GOT COMPLACENT. THEY SHOULD BE FINED FOR THERE LAXADAZY ATTITUDE.

F**K AM I GONNA BE BOTHERING GOING DOWN THAT MORGUE OF A HOMEGROUND OF OURS AGAIN THIS SEASON. MY SEASON TICKETS GOING BACK. THE EVERTON GAME WAS BAD ENOUGH. WE WERE s**t THAT DAY, AND I JUST SAT THERE THINKING WHAT AM I DOING HERE. BUT NOW THIS !!!!!!

PROUD HISTORY - BRIGHT FUTURE ..............MY ARSE
October 01, 2007

Sparks said:

We were shocking with possesion tonight, we were giving the ball away all over the pitch and I have to say reo-cocker was one of the worst culprit. If it hadn't been for some comedy defending we would have really been no where near that match.
October 01, 2007

AV33 said:

I'm gutted !!
Damian's comments reflect my feelings entirely.
Jol made some substitutions that changed the game. Our subs p**sed on the parade IMO. Luke Moore was admittedly playing a little deep but he made room and played in Gabby and Ash on numerous occasions.
As soon as Marlene came on, it all fell apart. I think the guy is as honest as the day is long but wihout the quality to be an AV centre forward in years to come. In fact, i reckon MON will realise what a mistake he's made and sell him to Blues in January !
Petrov looked s**te again and came on just when i thought Reo-Coker had started to wake up a bit.
Therefore, i think tactically Martin Jol got it right tonight with his expensive subs and MON didn't and he only has himself to blame. Open cheque book and four months, he could have brought some real quality on to stick number 5 in before they had chance to push us deeper and deeper and deeper.
9th place in the Premier tonight instead of 5th and threw away a 4-1 advantage. MON is talking about bad referees, bad linesman, the penalty we should have had etc on Setanta right now but i can't help thinking if we could have brought a bit of quality on to s**t the life out of them when it mattered, we might be sitting in 5th place now.

UP THE VILLA smilies/wink.gif
October 01, 2007

CornwallPaul said:

Rubbish ! I am so glad I diddnt text my Yid mate 20 mins to go!
October 01, 2007

Shanks said:

Marlon Harewood, what a complete waste of money! what the hell happend to villa's defense today? they just didnt know how to pass the ball to a team mate, villa player get the ball- villa player boot the ball, carew wasnt on pitch boys!! no excuses, we were all over the place and at no time did we have control of the game. after this performance im not looking forward to my trip to villa park for West Ham!
October 01, 2007

davesayers said:

so p**sed off, just worked a breakless 9 hour shift, missed the game, and had to use mobile internet to read that we threw the game away
October 01, 2007 | url

xandeh said:

I think the problem boils down to the squad, as mentioned below Martin Jols subs were spot on but when you've got bent, Malbranque and Defoe on the bench, who's surprised, if we had another 4 or 5 good players we could have brought on, I'd make a safe bet we'd have taken home 3 points tonight. Sadly this wasn't the case.
October 01, 2007

Madarab said:

I know it is easy to say in hindsight, but I knew they would come back. Tonight was a perfect litmus test for who is up to the job and who is not. If we want to be in Europe next season, then we need to be locking down when we go a goal up, let alone 3.

I am never one to jump on a bandwagon, but I have to say that nearly all of MON´s signings did not show up tonight. Harewood looked oafish, Petrov invisible, Knight clumsy and NRC (who I think has done well in some previous games)looked like a headless chicken.

On the flip side, it should be said that Martin Laursen is looking as good as anybody in the league, and Gardner has surely done enough to merit a decent run.

Absolutely gutted.

October 01, 2007

clive said:

happy birthday spurs 4-4 its getting better.where was jimmy greaves tonight?
October 01, 2007

Dizzy Mugs said:

Flashbacks of Spurs - Fulham in my head smilies/wink.gif
October 01, 2007

matt-the-villan said:

I know the team threw away the 4-1 lead but i must say Harewood is Fu**ing awfull!!!! He came on and cost us the game. If we had a beeter squad we would have shut that game down and would be in 5th now. A point is all we deserve but send Harewood back to the hammers he is a terrible signing!
October 01, 2007

AV33 said:

to Madarab
I too thought Laursen was absolutely immense.
Gardner also had a good game. Ashley Young impressed me with his defensive play as well as his obvious ability going forward.
Like a lot have said on here...we knew we were sitting on a lead at half time that we probably wouldn't keep.
MON should have brought some real quality when he had the chance and maybe things would be a bit different right now. smilies/sad.gif
October 01, 2007

Woodinho said:

linden1983 you moron... even though if you need to get rid of your season ticket send it my way.

I still think we are good for europe this season but only if we get rid of those two waste of space players harewood and petrov!
October 01, 2007

ste231981 said:

like ive been saying since he signed marlon deadwood
4 mil id have actually preferred we sign peskey hesky dodgey leg an all than that shrek looking moron deadwood what a joke!

mon great man manager tactically inept!
October 01, 2007

OneVilla said:

Marlon Harewood needs to be SOLD TONIGHT on ebay. WHY DID Villa buy HIM! WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!? I do not understand it. He scored 4 GOALS in 21 app for West Ham last year! WHY are Villa buying these kind of players? Is it LACK of money NO! So someone... anyone... explain to me PLEASE! It is SHOCKING simply SHOCKING that we drew 4-4 and Marlon Harewood it part of the reason. We could have been sitting in 5th spot with a game in hand... SHOCKING!
October 01, 2007

AVFC We Love U!! said:

We were not very good tonight, and if spurs were a half decent team we would never have even got 4 goals. However we DID get 4 and at 4-1 up no good team should be letting in another 3 in the final 25mins.

I would have been happy with a point if offered it from the start, but at 4-1 i expect villa to hold on for the win.

Several players dissapointed me tonight, most notably Ashley Young. How many crosses passes did he fail to make meet a villa player?!

Im not happy with just a point, but lets be honest, if it hadnt been for Robinson being crap we would never have got 4 goals in the first place.

A point away is better than nothing, now BRING ON WEST HAM!!
October 01, 2007

kieran said:

harewood was terrible, but lets not all get on his back about it, if it was barry, laursen or mellberg that played bad we wouldnt be on there back like this, its his second appearence and obviously he wants to impress us fans and now he must feel more pressure to do this. give him a break, MON isnt an idiot he knows where he is going with harewood, maybe he will come good in the west ham game (if he plays. but lets forget that now and all look forwards to hitting the hammers for six because the west ham crowd are gonna be onto harewood and reo cokers backs no need for us to help them
October 01, 2007

pg said:

smilies/angry.gifMartin O'Neill is just the most nieve manager in the premier league. 4-1 their fans were going home, their team was in bits anf the manager lost his job. So toss pot O'Neill stops doind what got us the lead, drop's into defence, brings on the freak show ans we drop 3 goals. Lerner get this man outta here
October 01, 2007 | url

oldman villain said:

this just proves what everyone has known for a few years now what a small squad we have got, one or two injuries and we are in a right mess.so what does martin oneil do he sells more then he buys and this is the main problem. as for harewood i wouldnt play him in our local pub team,i was hoping like every other villa fan that martin oneil could bring the best out off him but this is never going to happen so get rid,and lets all forget because hes crap,back to the match 4-4 draw at spurs we should all be celebrating a great point but what a mess up, is martin oneil the right man for this once great club of ours i,m not so sure now,but we will find out at the end of the season one way or the other.up the villa
October 02, 2007

Richard Beech UTV said:

I watched the match in a pub in boro today. I laughed about how crap middlesbrough were and how we could go fifth. there were a few spurs fans in and just me and another villa fan from my uni. I knew as soon as it was 4 -2 they would equalise. there was a huge cheer in the pub as spurs equalised as i threw my pint at the wall and the other villa fan basically cried. what a nightmare. I blame it all on harewood aswell. he is so bad its untrue. why did he just blast it for a throw in when he had it in the corner flag!! what an absolute idiot. IS IT ME OR DOES IT ALWAYS SEEM TO BE VILLA FANS LIKE MYSELF THAT FEEL AS BAD AS THIS! WE ALWAYS F IT UP AND THROW IT AWAY, im worried to even watch soccer saturday or go to a match cause even if we are 4 - 1 we manage to ruin it. i was embarassed to support villa tonight and I feel the season will go down hill from here. WHY DID'NT WE GET ELONSO! OR SANTA CRUZ! WE GET HAREWOOD, KILL ME NOW!!!
October 02, 2007

Richard Beech UTV said:

god im depressed now, as an england and a villa fan i long to be happy about football. will that day ever come!? neither seem to be able to do anything right. im 22, i wonder if i will have anything to celebrate about football in the rest of my life. money money everywhere, not a pound wanted to be spent.
October 02, 2007

adelaidevillan said:

yes a poor display i agree but i think the way so called supporters are going on is abit harsh. come on support the team they would be feeling more than wot we r right now. instead of running players like marlon harewood down lets get behind him we sighned him so he's staying 4 now get off it. show some faith in o'neil we got a point should of got all but we didnt so shut up or p**s off
October 02, 2007

Lebo said:

doesn't the ball have to travel forward for there to be an offise?

if it does then the second goal for villa wasn't offside as it was played stragiht across ..
October 02, 2007

mossiewalsh said:

i was gutted last nite 4-1 up away from home with 30mins left and we draw. we should be shouting up shop at that point 2pts lost last nite we need to tighten up before west ham on saturday although i think NRC will score on saturday its meant to be. is the official site online yet
October 02, 2007

rugbyreddoodle said:

marlon harewood i would defo drive him 2 his next club he is rubbish
October 02, 2007

the_flabster said:

As alot of people have said we didnt deserve to be 4-1 up and we didnt play at all well last night at any stage. But thats not really the point, we were gifted a few goals (i think gabby's goal was down to skill & Gardner's freekick was abit of both) and we should have been cruising at 4-1. The defending wasnt good but Spurs were lost for ideas abit and looked down on themselves before harewood gave away that penaltie then that restored belief. Im abit miffed about the equaliser as it was clearly shown that Defoe was offside for a large part of the move. Yet nothing in the paper about it, if it was 1 of the top 4 that linesman would have been suspended. This is another example of why video evidence in some way should be used. It is almost impossible for the refs & linesman not to feel pressure because of the occasion and i believe it got to the linesman. Its not as if he was slightly off, he was way off and i noticed it whilst the play was going on. Even though we didnt play at all well i think we were robbed. It shouldnt have been 3 minutes added time either. I know this is just nit picking and the real problem lies in how we managed to throw away a 3 goal lead.

Ive calmed down today and i think a draw is a fair result even though we did blow it and as people said if before the game someone had offered me a point i would have taken it.

I think if we had had Carew fit we wouldnt have been alot better because he could have held up the ball and brought our defense abit of time but instead Spurs were constantly coming at us for like 25 minutes.

As people have said it wasnt a bad decision by MON to bring Harewood & Petrov on, what would have happened if another player had got injured (Moore or Gardner) we would have been alot worse off. It was the players who let the team down not the manager. Ive calmed down now and im willing to give Harewood another chance but he best start performing.

Overall i think we were lucky to gain a point the way we played, we were not very good and could barely string passes together. Its still hurts badly thought to be 4-1 up and throw it away.

UTV
October 02, 2007

PaulE said:

I think its unfair to blame MON for the draw by making those substitutions. At 4-1 up, you should be able to make like-for-like swaps without it affecting the outcome of the game.

I'm surprised no-one has criticised Luke Moore yet. I think MON did the right thing bringing him off because he was giving the ball away all night (although I'd have brought on Osbourne as an extra central defensive midfielder, personally). I'm a big fan of Moore, but he was poor last night. Harewood actually looked more threatening going forward than Moore did. He made a stupid mistake with the foul, but it should not have cost us the win (there were 2 other goals to concede).

I agree that we were lucky to be 4-1 up. If Spurs had Carson in goal, they'd have thrashed us last night. In fact, if I was a Spurs fan I'd want them to sign Carson and Laursen in January. They'd be top four then, for sure.
October 02, 2007

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Transfer Window Watch

IN: Curtis Davies, Steve Sidwell, Brad Guzan, Brad Friedel, Nicky Shorey, Luke Young
OUT: Patrik Berger, Scott Carson, Luke Moore, Olof Mellberg, Thomas Sorensen

Quick Question

Can Gareth Barry win back the fans after this or has he lost the love?
 

This is Brad Friedel

football bets AVFC Blog

Subscribe to our News Feed

RSS at the AVFC Blog

If you like the site and want to be one of the first to know when something is published, click here.

Share our News

Aston Villa on NewsNow Widgetize!